3 Pares No Poker

  • Real money online casinos are protected by highly advanced 3 Pares No Poker security features to 3 Pares No Poker ensure that the financial and personal data of their players is kept safely protected. The legitimate sites that we list as the best also have a solid reputation for ensuring their customer data is truly safe, keeping up with data.
  • Note that since suits have no relative value in poker, two hands can be considered identical if one hand can be transformed into the other by swapping suits. For example, the hand 3♣ 7♣ 8♣ Q♠ A♠ is identical to 3♦ 7♦ 8♦ Q♥ A♥ because replacing all of the clubs in the first hand with diamonds and all of the spades with hearts.

Three of a kind hands that differ by suit alone, such as 9 ♠ 9 ♥ 9 ♦ 10 ♦ 8 ♥ and 9 ♣ 9 ♠ 9 ♥ 10 ♦ 8 ♦, are of equal rank. In community card games, such as Texas hold 'em, three of a kind is called a set only when it comprises a pocket pair and a third card on the board.

billybabe
I do play where the PP is a low house edge. Is playing the pair plus ONLY a bad idea?
SOOPOO

I do play where the PP is a low house edge. Is playing the pair plus ONLY a bad idea?


Billy- your question is too vague for anyone to give you a reasonable answer.
What is the house edge on your PP side bet? (Low is too vague a word)
What are your goals when going to the casino?
What kind of bankroll do you have?
If you are NOT playing PP, what would you be playing?
Etc....
odiousgambit
There is a paytable of yesteryear that was probably worth it, but seldom seen now, it would seem.Pares
the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!” She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
billybabe
OK Thanks...here is more info
Here is the PP payout
SF 40
3 Kind 30
str8 6
Flsh 4
Pair 1
I have about $300..and would liek to double it. Thniking betting $10 hand on the pairplus only (also betting the $1 side bet with spades royal prog. jackpot ($6K)...not playing the ante (they allow pairplus betting only
3 Card Poker Prog pays are---
Mini Royal in spades Jackpot ----Envy$100
Mini Royal $500 ----Envy$25
Straight Flush I think was $80
Three of a Kind I think was $70
sodawater
deleted
winmonkeyspit3
Even though the flush pays 4x this is still a high HA bet. Play the casino games you enjoy, granted that you know the odds.
odiousgambit
40-30-6-4-1 is a good paytable with an HE of -2.32% according to the Wizard's page.
Playing the regular game has an HE that is not much better, even factoring in the 'element of risk' that the Wizard does. So I think your idea of playing just the side bet and not the regular game is fine.
To have the side bet desirable seems unusual, but it's all relative. Neither the regular game or the side bet has much appeal to someone looking for low HE. As others are urging here, forget about a strategy to win, double your money, or any of that. Play the game if you think it will be fun to win occasionally while realizing that you will lose overall.3 pares no poker no deposit
the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!” She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
WongBo
which casino is using the 40-30-6-4-1 table?
there was a certain casino in eastern PA that was using it
but they switched over in April to 40-30-6-3-1.
winmonkeyspit3

which casino is using the 40-30-6-4-1 table?
there was a certain casino in eastern PA that was using it
but they switched over in April to 40-30-6-3-1.

Existe 3 Pares No Poker


3 Pares No Poker No Deposit

Turning Stone uses this paytable.
FourFiveFace

Turning Stone uses this paytable.

3 Pares No Poker Vegas World


I've talked to people who said they used to let players play just the Pairs Plus there. Is the good pay table the reason why they don't let players do that anymore? Were they losing money, or is this a case of management being just as superstitious as the average player?
  • Page 1 of 3